Rent-to-buy PCO car hire is a long fixed term weekly hire agreement on a car already licensed for private hire, usually two to five years. The provider keeps legal title throughout and normally stays the registered keeper. Ownership passes to you only after every contracted payment, normally plus a small transfer fee at the end. Almost every one of these agreements offered to London private hire drivers is written to sit outside consumer credit regulation, and that is where the risk lives.
Rent-to-buy is a label, not a legal product
Until that transfer moment you are a hirer, not an owner. Everything else in this article follows from that one fact.
The same product is advertised under at least five names: rent-to-buy, rent-to-own, lease-to-own, hire with an option to purchase, and own your car schemes. None of those phrases is a legal category. The label tells you nothing about your rights. The document type tells you everything.
There is a specific trap in the phrase "rent-to-own". The FCA does have a formal rent-to-own category, and drivers who have read about it sometimes assume its protections apply to them. They cannot. The FCA's rent-to-own rules use a defined term, and the definition is at CONC 5B.7.1R(7). An RTO agreement is a regulated credit agreement, it has to be hire purchase or conditional sale, and the goods have to be household goods, which CONC 5B.7.1R(5) defines as goods normally found in a residential home. Goods acquired principally for business purposes are excluded outright. A PCO car on a business-use agreement written to sit outside regulation fails three of those requirements at once. So if you have read about rent-to-own protections, you have read about a different product.
Debt advice bodies are blunter about it. National Debtline notes that creditors use terms like "rent to own" and "personal contract purchase" to describe what are, underneath, hire purchase agreements. Hold that thought, because it is where this article ends up.
How rent-to-buy PCO car hire works, step by step
Most pages on this topic tell you what to ask about the mechanism. Few describe it actually running. Here is the sequence.
-
The eligibility gate. A valid TfL private hire driver licence, so a London badge, a full driving licence held for a minimum period (usually one to three years), a minimum age, proof that you are actively working on a platform, and proof of address. No provider will hand you a car without the badge, so if you do not hold one yet, start with how to get your PCO licence in London. Credit history is often not part of it, for reasons covered further down.
-
A reservation fee, then a down payment. The reservation fee is typically small and normally deducted from the down payment rather than added to it. The down payment matters more than its size: on straight hire you pay a returnable deposit, and on rent-to-buy you almost always pay a non refundable down payment. One major operator publishes that distinction itself, listing a returnable deposit on its hire product and "down payment is not refundable" as a stated downside of its rent-to-buy product. That is the single sharpest published difference between the two.
-
Signing a fixed term agreement. Advertised terms run from two to five years. Providers quote them inconsistently, some in weeks (104 weeks, 208 weeks), some in months (36 to 60 months), some in years. The number in your signed paperwork is the only one that counts.
-
Weekly collection. Payment comes out weekly rather than monthly, which matches platform earnings, and it is usually a single composite figure with services bundled inside it.
-
The term runs, and nothing changes hands. This is the part drivers misunderstand. There is no equity balance, no capital account, no ledger you can draw against. The marketing line is that every payment moves you closer to owning the car. Legally, every payment discharges a rental obligation and the ownership position at week 150 is identical to the ownership position at week 2. Payment holidays, commonly advertised at 4 to 8 weeks a year, pause the payments and push the end date out rather than shortening the road to title.
-
The final contracted payment. Making it does not, by itself, always transfer the car.
-
A separate transfer event. An administrative fee or option fee is paid, and then title and the V5C move to you.
Step 7 is the one to hammer. Ownership is a discrete transaction with its own trigger and its own cost, not an automatic drift at the end of the payments. Agreements in this market are commonly written as a fixed count of weekly rentals, 104 or 208 of them, under which the provider holds title throughout and title plus the V5C move only once every contracted rental has been paid and a separate transfer or option fee has been paid on top. Ask what that fee is and when it falls due. It is not in the advertised weekly figure.
Before you pay any of it, read what to get in writing before you pay anything.
Who owns the car while you are paying for it?
Three roles get confused constantly, and separating them answers most of the questions drivers actually have.
The legal owner is the provider, for the whole term, until the transfer event.
The DVLA registered keeper is also normally the provider. This is not a technicality. TfL issues the private hire vehicle licence to the vehicle's owner, and its policy identifies that owner as the registered keeper as defined by the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994 (see the TfL taxi and private hire vehicle policy). That is why the PHV licence sits in the provider's name and gets bundled into your weekly figure.
You are the hirer in possession. You drive it, you earn in it, you are responsible for it under the contract, and you own none of it.
Four practical consequences follow.
You are usually driving on the provider's insurance policy, which means you are not building a claims history or no claims discount in your own name. When the car eventually becomes yours, you arrive at the insurance market as a new private hire risk.
Penalty charge notices land with the registered keeper. On short term rentals a provider can pass that liability to the driver through the vehicle hire route, but that route requires a hiring agreement of under six months, so a multi year rent-to-buy cannot use it. That does not mean the charges stay with the provider. Your agreement will almost certainly pass them to you by indemnity instead, and add an administration fee for processing each one. Read how charges and fines are handled, and what the handling fee is, before you sign.
The V5C changes hands only at transfer. Nothing on the paperwork shifts at week 100 to reflect what you have paid.
And if the provider is the legal owner, the car sits on the provider's balance sheet, subject to whatever the provider owes on it.
Is rent-to-buy the same as hire purchase, PCP or a lease?
Rent-to-buy is closest to hire purchase, and often is hire purchase in substance whatever the document is headed.
Hire purchase is defined at article 60L of the Regulated Activities Order: goods bailed to a person in return for periodical payments, where property in the goods will pass to them if the terms are complied with and either an option to purchase is exercised, or some other specified act is done, or a specified event happens. Read that against the seven steps above. Weekly payments, bailment, title passing on completion plus a fee, and you have the definition satisfied.
That definition is functional. It describes a structure, not a name, so what settles the character of your agreement is whether the document answers the description, not what is printed across the top of it. A near identical definition has sat in section 29(1) of the Hire Purchase Act 1964 for sixty years, so this is settled ground rather than a novel reading. If your paperwork bails you a car in return for weekly payments and promises title once you have made all of them and paid a fee, it has the shape of hire purchase whatever it is called. Ask the provider to tell you in writing which document type you are being given and whether it is regulated. A firm that cannot answer that in one sentence is not a firm to sign a four year commitment with.
Here is how the structures actually differ on the things a driver can feel.
| What you are comparing | Straight weekly rental | Rent-to-buy | Dealer hire purchase | PCP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who owns it during the term | Provider | Provider | Finance company | Finance company |
| Ownership route at the end | None, car goes back | Title on final payment plus a transfer fee | Title on final payment, sometimes an option fee | Pay the balloon, hand back, or part exchange |
| Payment rhythm | Weekly | Weekly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Large final payment | None | Normally none | None | Yes, the balloon |
| Insurance and servicing | Normally inside the payment | Sometimes inside, sometimes not | Yours to arrange | Yours to arrange |
| Registered keeper | Provider | Normally provider | Normally you | Normally you |
| Affordability assessed | Not applicable | Often not | Yes, if regulated | Yes, if regulated |
| Walk away mid term | Yes, on notice | Only on contract terms | Voluntary termination, if regulated | Voluntary termination, if regulated |
Conditional sale (an obligation to buy rather than an option, with title passing automatically on the last payment) and lease purchase (a compulsory balloon, so no hand back) also exist.
One legal point that keeps the categories tidy. A weekly PCO rental is bailment capable of subsisting for more than three months, which makes it a consumer hire agreement under article 60N. Article 60N expressly excludes hire purchase from that definition. So the two routes are mutually exclusive: your agreement is either credit-shaped or hire-shaped, never both, and which one it is changes your rights considerably. One qualification. Both chapters only engage where the hirer or borrower is an individual, or a partnership of two or three persons, or an unincorporated body (article 60N(3) with article 60L(1)). If the agreement is signed by your limited company, it is outside the FCA perimeter from the start, no threshold test and no declaration required.
Once the question becomes which specific car makes sense on this structure the answer stops being generic, and so does working out which of the three documents you have been handed. We have written both up separately: how that works out on a BMW i7 against a Mercedes S580Le.
Why is there no credit check on rent-to-buy PCO cars?
"No credit checks" is the loudest line in this sector. It is presented as generosity. It is a property of the paperwork.
The FCA creditworthiness and affordability duty sits in CONC 5.2A. CONC 5.2A.1R applies the section to a firm with respect to consumer credit lending, and CONC 5.2A.4R requires a reasonable assessment of creditworthiness before entering into a regulated credit agreement. An agreement deliberately built to fall outside the regulated perimeter is outside that duty. There is nothing to comply with, so nothing gets checked.
One precision point, because a blanket claim here would be wrong. On the genuine hire branch there was never a CONC 5.2A duty in the first place, since hire is not lending. So the honest statement is not "rent-to-buy escapes affordability checks", it is that on the credit-shaped version the duty is switched off by the exemption, and on the hire-shaped version it never applied.
The market is also not uniform. Several providers publish no credit checks. One publishes in its own comparison table that credit checks are "often required" on its rent-to-own product. Another describes an alternative assessment based on driving experience and platform earnings history rather than credit files.
The takeaway is simple and it is not a criticism of anyone. Nobody has assessed whether you can carry this commitment for four years. That assessment is yours to do, and you are doing it without the safety net that a regulated lender's decline would have given you.
Is rent-to-buy regulated? The £25,000 rule that decides it
Most of these agreements are written to be exempt from regulation using the business purposes exemption. Getting the direction of that exemption right matters, because it is stated backwards constantly.
The business purposes exemption is available only where the figure exceeds £25,000. It is not available below £25,000.
Both branches run the same two limb test and both limbs are required: a money limb, credit exceeding £25,000 on the credit branch under article 60C(3) or payments the hirer is required by the agreement to make exceeding £25,000 on the hire branch under article 60O(1), plus a business purpose limb, that the agreement is entered into wholly or predominantly for the purposes of a business carried on, or intended to be carried on, by the borrower or hirer. We set out that two limb analysis in full in the companion article.
There is no cheap route out of regulation. The Order does contain a sub threshold business exemption at article 60C(4), but it is confined to green deal plans, with a further route added for Bounce Back Loan Scheme agreements. Neither touches car finance. On the credit branch there is no exempt route below £25,000. On the hire branch there is one other door, and it is not the business one: article 60Q exempts a consumer hire agreement of any size where the hirer is an individual who signs a declaration forgoing the protections and a statement of high net worth has been made for them under CONC App 1.4.7R, meaning net income of at least £150,000 or net assets of at least £500,000. Almost no driver clears that. If a provider asks you to sign that declaration rather than the business one, you are being asked to certify something different, so read which one you are being given.
Which gate applies depends on the document. Because article 60L treats hire purchase as fixed sum credit, a hire purchase shaped rent-to-buy goes through article 60C(3), and the threshold bites on the credit figure, meaning the total price less any deposit and less the total charge for credit. It does not bite on total payments. That is a harder test to clear than the hire one.
And here is a point nobody in this market seems to have noticed. Article 60O looks at payments the hirer is required by the agreement to make. On a rolling weekly rental that either party can end at short notice, the payments the agreement actually requires may never exceed £25,000, whatever the driver ends up paying in practice. On that structure the exemption may not be reachable at all.
The paperwork that carries the exemption is a prescribed declaration at CONC App 1.4.8R. Two checkable facts about it. First, CONC App 1.4.5R requires the declaration to comply with CONC App 1.4.8R, to be set out in the credit agreement or consumer hire agreement no less prominently than the other information in it and readily distinguishable from the background medium, and to be signed by you unless you have signed the agreement itself. So it should not arrive as a loose side letter and it should not be buried in small print. Second, it creates only a rebuttable presumption. Under article 60C(5) and (6) on the credit branch, and article 60O(2) and (3) in identical terms on the hire branch, the presumption falls away where the lender or owner, or anyone acting on their behalf, knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that the agreement is not entered into wholly or predominantly for business purposes. Signing the form is not what makes the deal a business deal. Being a business deal is.
We have set out the exact four paragraphs you are asked to sign in the companion article.
What protection you give up, and what you keep
The declaration tells you that you lose protections. It does not list them, and neither does any provider page in this market. The list depends on which document you signed, which is why the next two sections split credit from hire. Two of the losses commonly repeated in the trade are simply wrong, and they are corrected below.
What the exemption removes
Protection against repossession without a court order. Start here, because it is about the car being taken away. On a regulated hire purchase, section 90 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 makes the goods protected goods once you are in breach, you have paid one third or more of the total price, and the provider still holds title. At that point it cannot recover the car except by order of the court. Section 91 goes further: if it repossesses in breach of that, the agreement terminates, you are released from all liability, and you can recover everything you have paid. On an exempt agreement, neither applies.
Section 92(1) is the wider loss and the one that reaches both branches. On a regulated hire purchase, conditional sale or consumer hire agreement the creditor or owner cannot enter any premises to take possession of the goods except under a court order, with no one third condition attached, and an entry in breach is actionable as a breach of statutory duty under section 92(3). On an exempt agreement that protection is gone on both the credit branch and the hire branch, and recovery is governed by your contract, subject only to the general law point below about forced entry onto private premises.
The FCA creditworthiness and affordability assessment. Gone on the credit branch, because CONC 5.2A applies to regulated lending. Never applied on the hire branch.
The CONC 7 arrears, default and recovery regime. CONC 7 hangs off activities, not agreement labels, and the two that matter here, consumer credit lending and consumer hiring, are both defined by reference to regulated agreements. So the forbearance rules do not reach your provider on an exempt agreement. One gap is worth knowing: CONC 7.1.1R(4) also applies the chapter to firms carrying on debt collecting, and the provider is excluded from that activity only because it is the lender or owner (RAO article 39H). If your arrears are passed to a third party collector, CONC 7.3.4R requires that firm to treat you with forbearance and due consideration. Tellingly, the only exempt agreements deliberately pulled back into CONC 7 in their own right are Bounce Back Loans, at CONC 7.1.3A.
Section 87 default notices and section 129 time orders. Both are drafted for regulated agreements. So are the improper execution protections in sections 61 and 65.
Voluntary termination. Section 99 lets a debtor under a regulated hire purchase or conditional sale agreement terminate at any time before the final payment falls due, with liability capped by section 100 at half the total price. On an exempt agreement it does not exist. Two precision points. That right never existed on a hire agreement at all, so this loss bites only on the hire purchase branch. And the hire analogue, section 101, would not have helped either: it is disapplied by section 101(7)(a) where the agreement provides for payments exceeding £1,500 in any year, which every PCO car clears, and again by section 101(7)(b) where the goods are bailed for the purposes of the hirer's business and were selected by the hirer and bought in by the owner at their request. Even where it does apply, section 101(3) means the notice cannot expire until 18 months after the agreement was made.
Section 56 protection on what the sales process told you. Section 56 of the Consumer Credit Act, which stops a lender disclaiming what its own sales process told you and voids any term making the salesperson your agent instead of the creditor's, is drafted for regulated agreements. Section 56(1)(a) covers negotiations conducted in relation to the making of a regulated agreement, and the anti avoidance provision in section 56(3) is itself limited to an actual or prospective regulated agreement. On an exempt agreement you are left with ordinary misrepresentation law and whatever the entire agreement clause says.
Consumer Rights Act 2015 protection. A driver taking a car to work private hire is acting for business purposes, so the consumer regime does not apply.
Possibly your route to the Financial Ombudsman. Write this one carefully. The compulsory jurisdiction in DISP 2.3.1R is broader than regulated activities and includes a lending money limb, while consumer hire and the bailment of goods appear nowhere in the list. So unregulated consumer hire looks clearly outside it, and unregulated hire purchase written by an authorised firm is arguable. You may have no route to the Ombudsman. Do not assume you have one, and do not assume you have none.
Two things the trade repeats that are wrong, and worth knowing so you are not arguing the wrong point.
You do not lose section 75, because it never applied. Section 75 covers debtor creditor supplier agreements within section 12(b) or (c). Hire purchase is a section 12(a) agreement, because the creditor is also the supplier, so section 75 does not apply to hire purchase even when fully regulated. Section 75(3) also excludes any item with a cash price over £30,000, which every executive car clears.
You do not lose the unfair relationship remedy on a credit agreement. Sections 140A and 140B survive the business exemption. Section 140C(1) defines a credit agreement for those sections as any agreement providing credit of any amount, and section 140A excludes only article 60C(2) mortgage cases and Bounce Back Loans. Business-exempt agreements are not carved out. That is precisely why the third paragraph of the prescribed declaration preserves the court's section 140B power, and precisely why the FCA's own footnote says to omit that paragraph on a consumer hire agreement. So a hire purchase shaped rent-to-buy keeps section 140B. A genuine hire agreement never had it. This also depends on you being the debtor as an individual: section 140C(1) defines a credit agreement for sections 140A and 140B as one between an individual and another person, and section 189(1) stretches "individual" only as far as a two or three person partnership or an unincorporated body. If your company signed, section 140B is not there either.
What still protects you
The exemption strips out the FCA and Consumer Credit Act layer. It does not strip out general commercial law.
On a hire purchase agreement the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 implies a term that the goods are of satisfactory quality, and the provider is itself the supplier, so a quality or description claim lies against it directly rather than against some distant dealer. On the hire branch the equivalent is section 9(2) of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, which implies satisfactory quality where the owner bails goods in the course of a business. Either way the claim lies against the provider, because the provider is the supplier.
An attempt to exclude that implied quality term in a business contract is not automatically void, but it is tested for reasonableness under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, section 6(1A) on the hire purchase branch and section 7(1A) on the hire branch, rather than sailing through.
General law also constrains recovery. Whatever the contract says, a provider cannot force entry onto private premises without consent. And on the credit branch, as above, the court's section 140B power over an unfair relationship survives.
Can you hand a rent-to-buy PCO car back early?
Only on the terms your contract gives you, and this is the mirror image of the marketing promise.
Because title passes only on completion plus the transfer fee, a driver who exits at week 200 of 208 is in the same legal position as one who exits at week 10: a bailee handing back the owner's car. There is no capital account to redeem and no equity to cash out. In proprietary terms that is true at week 200 as much as at week 10, because none was ever created. What can differ is the fairness of the exit charge: on the credit branch the court's section 140B power survives, as set out above, and a forfeiture that bites hardest on a driver who has paid almost everything is exactly the kind of term that power exists to reopen. That is a claim to bring, not a right you hold.
Providers publish this themselves. One states plainly that you can return the vehicle early but "you'll forfeit the equity you've built up". Another writes that ending early may mean losing the ownership benefits or any payments already made towards the car, and that missed payments can mean late fees, a paused contract, or removal from the ownership path altogether.
Published exit terms vary enormously. At one end, cancellation permitted after a short minimum period with 4 weeks' notice and a modest fee. At the other, one provider publishes an early termination charge of 16 weeks of vehicle payments plus a £750 remarketing fee. Most commonly, a page that says only that fees may apply and that the terms will be set out in your agreement. Some operators publish minimum commitment and notice periods that differ between pages on their own site, which is reason enough to work from the signed document rather than the website.
One useful detail. At least one operator publishes a weekly payment split into a distinct vehicle element and other elements, calculating its early termination charge on the vehicle element alone. That is the cleanest available evidence that an advertised weekly figure is a composite, and that only part of it relates to the car itself.
Payment holidays pause payments but extend the path to ownership, so 4 weeks off is 4 more weeks before the car is yours.
Repossession here is contractual rather than statutory, because the protected goods route in section 90 and the court order requirement in section 92 do not apply to an exempt agreement. What can happen, how quickly, and on what notice, is whatever the document says. Which is why the termination clause, both ways, is on our list of things to get in writing: the exact early termination charge, the notice period, and what happens to the payments you have already made. If a provider will not put the third one in writing, that is your answer.
What is in the weekly price, and what is not
Inclusion is not a market standard. This is the single biggest trap when a driver puts two weekly figures side by side.
Some providers bundle comprehensive private hire insurance, servicing, MOT, road tax, breakdown cover and the PHV licence into one weekly payment. Others publish a weekly price with insurance excluded and offered as a paid add on, sometimes with the exclusion printed on every vehicle listing. At least one operator's own published comparison table shows insurance and servicing sitting with the driver on the rent-to-own product while being included in the weekly price on the hire product. Same company, same car, entirely different number.
Where servicing is included there are carve outs, and the insurance excess is the figure drivers get surprised by, so ask what it is on a fault claim and on split liability before you sign.
Mileage is published by some providers and omitted entirely by others, and where it is published the annual figure is lower than 52 times the weekly figure, so the weekly cap cannot be run continuously and excess miles are charged per mile.
Our own position, stated once and factually: Blackties rents, and our weekly rental price includes insurance, servicing and 24/7 RAC cover. You can see what is included in our weekly price along with current cars and availability.
What happens when the rent-to-buy car becomes yours?
The day the car becomes yours is the day the bills start. On the transfer date the bundle stops.
From that morning you are arranging and paying for hire and reward insurance in your own name, servicing, MOT, road tax, breakdown cover and the private hire vehicle licence. Because the vehicle licence follows the registered keeper, it has to be moved into your name when the V5C transfers, which is a piece of administration nobody warns drivers about because during the term the provider handled it invisibly.
The car you are taking on is by then three to five years old and has done PCO mileage. On a premium car the manufacturer warranty commonly expires well before the term ends, so the vehicle arrives with you at the point it has no manufacturer cover left, on a car where a single air suspension unit or high voltage component is a serious bill.
The framing that helps here is this. The weekly payment does not fall to zero at the end of a rent-to-buy. It converts into a set of separate bills you have never had to arrange, arriving on a car that is older than the one you started with.
Will the car still be Uber Exec or Lux eligible in four years?
Advertised terms of two to five years outlive the rules that decide what a car is allowed to do.
Platform vehicle criteria change. TfL age limits bite at re-licensing in London. A driver signing a four year agreement on an executive car is betting that the car remains eligible for the tier they earn in for the whole of that term, not just on the day they collect it. If it ages out of Exec or Lux in year three, the payments carry on and the earnings that justified them do not.
So before committing to a long agreement, check the car against the Uber Exec and Lux vehicle rules changing on 1 August 2026, including how grandfathering applies to it.
Who rent-to-buy suits, and who it does not
This is a question about your situation, not about the car.
It suits a driver who is confident they will still be doing this work in four years. Who genuinely wants the asset at the end rather than just liking the idea of it. Who understands what the exemption removes and accepts that trade knowingly rather than by accident. And who can absorb the running costs at the point the bundle stops.
It does not suit a driver whose plans may change, or who values being able to walk away in a bad quarter. And it does not suit anyone who cannot get the exit terms in writing before paying the down payment.
Whether renting, rent-to-buy or finance in your own name is the better route depends on your credit position and your plans rather than on the mechanism, and we have set out our view separately: rent, rent-to-buy or finance in your own name.
Where we stand
Blackties is a rental company. What we do is straightforward. One weekly price, black executive cars, with insurance, servicing and 24/7 RAC cover included. Current cars and availability are on our current fleet and weekly prices.
If you take one thing from this article, take this: the label on the front of the agreement is marketing, and the document underneath it decides your rights. Read the document.
This article is general information about how these agreements are structured. It is not legal or financial advice. If you are unsure about the consequences of an agreement that is not regulated, take independent advice before you sign.
Quick answers
What is rent-to-buy PCO car hire?
Rent-to-buy is a marketing label, not a legal category. You hire a car already licensed for private hire for a fixed term, usually two to five years, paying weekly. The provider stays the legal owner throughout. Title moves to you only after every contracted payment, plus normally a small transfer fee, is paid.
Who owns a rent-to-buy PCO car during the agreement?
The provider does. It holds legal title and is normally the DVLA registered keeper, which is why the private hire vehicle licence and often the insurance sit in its name. You are a hirer in possession, not an owner. The V5C changes hands only when the agreement completes and title transfers.
Is rent-to-buy the same as hire purchase or PCP?
It is closest to hire purchase, which the Regulated Activities Order defines at article 60L as goods bailed for periodical payments with title passing on a specified act. It is not PCP, which ends with a large balloon payment, a hand back or a part exchange rather than automatic title. The other differences are practical: weekly rather than monthly payments, a bundled services package, and usually no credit check.
Why is there no credit check on rent-to-buy PCO cars?
Because the agreement is normally written for business purposes and structured to sit outside FCA consumer credit rules. The creditworthiness and affordability duty in CONC 5.2A applies to regulated lending only. The absence of a check is a property of how the paperwork is built, not a concession from the provider.
Is rent-to-buy PCO car hire regulated by the FCA?
Usually not. Hiring goods for more than three months and hire purchase are both regulated activities, but the business purposes exemption takes an agreement outside the rules where it is entered into wholly or predominantly for a business and the figure exceeds £25,000, which every executive car clears. Below £25,000 on the credit branch there is no business exemption at all.
Can I hand a rent-to-buy car back early?
Only on the terms your contract gives you. The Consumer Credit Act voluntary termination right, which caps liability at half the total price, applies to regulated hire purchase and conditional sale agreements. On an exempt business agreement it does not exist, so notice periods, exit fees and forfeited payments are purely contractual.
How long is a rent-to-buy PCO contract?
Advertised terms in London run from two to five years, most often three to five, and are quoted in weeks, months or years depending on the provider. One publicly documented agreement ran to 208 weekly rentals over four years. Treat the term written in your signed paperwork as the only reliable figure.
Is there a balloon payment at the end of rent-to-buy?
Usually not. Most providers advertise no balloon and instead charge a small administrative or title transfer fee at the end, which functions as the option to purchase payment. Some agreements in the wider market do carry a large final sum, so check the final payment line before you sign.
Is insurance included in a rent-to-buy PCO car?
Sometimes. Some providers bundle comprehensive private hire insurance, servicing, MOT, road tax and breakdown cover into the weekly figure. Others publish the weekly price with insurance excluded as a paid add on. Two weekly prices are not comparable until you know exactly what each one includes.
What happens when a rent-to-buy PCO car becomes mine?
The bundle stops. From the transfer date you arrange and pay for private hire insurance, servicing, MOT, road tax, breakdown cover and the vehicle licence yourself, on a car that is by then three to five years old. The weekly payment ends and separate monthly bills begin.
Do I need a PCO licence before getting a rent-to-buy car?
Yes. A valid TfL private hire driver licence is the first item on every provider's eligibility list, alongside a full driving licence held for a minimum period, a minimum age, proof that you are working on a platform and proof of address. If you do not hold a badge yet, start with how to get your PCO licence in London.
Can I use a rent-to-buy car on Uber Exec or Lux?
If the vehicle meets the tier criteria, yes, but eligibility is set by the platform and by TfL, not by your provider, and it can change during a four year term. Check the 2026 Uber Exec and Lux vehicle criteria before committing to a long agreement.